Ontario Centrist Party on Fair Transit Funding

Ontario Centrist Party on Fair Transit Funding

Ontario announced more than $128 million to renew Niagara Transit’s fleet, including replacing old buses, adding paratransit vehicles, and installing safety cameras and real-time tracking. In Toronto, construction advanced on the Ontario Line with a new tunnel launch shaft along Pape Avenue. Both announcements reflect investments in public transit, but the Ontario Centrist Party sees gaps that must be addressed.

Transit funding in Ontario too often comes late and lands unevenly. Riders endure years of unreliable service before upgrades are delivered. In Niagara, residents have long complained of aging buses breaking down or routes being cut when demand was highest. In Toronto, whole neighbourhoods remain poorly served by subway access, forcing longer commutes and heavier reliance on cars. These new projects are welcome, but they illustrate a pattern: government acts only after frustration has built for years.

For people, this is not about engineering or contracts. It is about missed work because the bus didn’t come, or a parent standing in the cold with children waiting for a vehicle that broke down. It is about students in neighbourhoods without a subway stop spending hours of their week in traffic. Every one of these details affects cost of living, stress, and quality of life.

The Ontario Centrist Party believes transit must be planned around people first, not political cycles. That means directing new investment to the communities with the poorest service, not just the easiest projects to deliver. It also means supporting residents during construction, whether with shuttle routes, clear information, or financial help for businesses disrupted by road closures.

When Ontarians see their tax dollars at work, they deserve to see the benefit quickly and fairly. Transit should reduce stress, not create it. Our commitment is to press for practical, region-by-region planning that measures success by riders’ daily lives, not ribbon-cuttings. Let’s get to work.

Milton’s Catholic School Board Balances the Books. What Comes Next?

From the Milton Constituency Association – Ontario Centrist Party
June 25, 2025

On June 24, the Halton Catholic District School Board (HCDSB) approved a balanced operating budget of $533.9 million for the 2025–2026 school year.

Board Chair Marvin Duarte and Director of Education John Klein praised the effort as fiscally responsible and aligned with their multi-year strategy. Despite being the lowest-funded school board per student in Ontario, HCDSB continues to meet compliance targets set by the Ministry of Education.

For Milton residents, the news is both reassuring and frustrating. The Board is doing everything it can with limited provincial support. But the reality is that funding formulas are not keeping pace with population growth, student need, or facility demand.

What the Numbers Show

  • Projected total enrolment: 36,421 students across elementary and secondary levels

  • Estimated revenue: $546.1 million

  • Estimated expenses: $533.9 million

  • Budget submission deadline: June 30, 2025

On paper, this is a balanced and compliant budget. On the ground, it reflects a system that is stretched thin, especially in fast-growing communities like Milton.

A Centrist Perspective on Education in Growth Regions

According to Syed Mohsin Rizvi, Chair of the Milton Constituency Association:

“Milton’s growth is visible in every classroom, every hallway, and every school parking lot. Our teachers are stepping up, but the provincial support isn’t keeping up. This is not about meeting minimums. It’s about building a future that works.”

The Ontario Centrist Party respects the careful stewardship shown by HCDSB leadership. But we also believe that the Ministry of Education must act to correct a structural imbalance in how education funding is delivered to high-growth communities.

What Needs to Change

1. Enrolment-Linked Capital Funding
The province should tie school capital project approvals directly to population growth data, so that new buildings are authorized as need increases, not delayed by bureaucracy.

2. Mid-Year Funding Adjustments
Current funding models rely too heavily on outdated projections. Milton needs a dynamic model that reflects actual student growth as it happens.

3. Frontline Support and Staffing Stability
Balanced budgets should not come at the expense of under-resourced classrooms or burnt-out educators. Investments in mental health, special education, and support staff must be built into the baseline.

Our Next Step

Milton continues to meet the challenges placed before it. But it cannot do this alone. The provincial government must treat growing communities like Milton as priorities, not footnotes.

The Ontario Centrist Party is preparing a public policy submission to the Ministry of Education that outlines common-sense reforms to ensure funding fairness across Ontario. Milton will be at the center of that conversation.

We encourage all residents — parents, students, teachers, and local leaders — to get involved.

Connect with the Milton CA
Website: https://ontariocentristparty.ca/milton
WhatsApp: CPO Milton CA Whatsapp

Women in the Centre: Launching a Bold Agenda for Ontario’s Future

Letter to the Founding Members of Women in the Centre

To all the incredible women who’ve joined Women in the Centre,

I want to start this letter with humility. As a man writing to a group of accomplished, capable, and community-driven women, I understand that my role here is not to lead, it’s to support. What follows is not a directive, but a set of suggestions. This agenda is meant to offer a starting point, a framework that I hope serves as a helpful foundation as you decide together what this group will become.

Over the last few years, I’ve listened closely to countless women across Ontario; mothers, professionals, caregivers, entrepreneurs that speak about the structural and personal barriers they continue to face. What I heard was honest, often difficult, and deeply motivating. This group exists because those voices matter and because Ontario needs to reflect them in our politics, in our priorities, and in our leadership.

Women in the Centre is a civic initiative within the Ontario Centrist Party, but it belongs entirely to its members. The agenda below is simply a guide, a tool to help us begin moving in a direction that brings meaningful change to women’s lives across this province.

Vision & Core Deliverables

  • Policy Development: Drive policy that reflects lived experience and supports real progress for women in Ontario.
  • Leadership Pipeline: Identify, mentor, and support women into leadership and political roles across the province.
  • Community Mobilization: Build networks that inform, connect, and empower women to lead change where they live and work.

Year One Priorities

1. Women’s Health & Reproductive Care

  • Establish a taskforce focused on OB/GYN access, postpartum care, and rural health gaps.
  • Advocate for improved mental health resources, including perimenopause and trauma-informed care.
  • Push for stronger data collection and research on women’s long-COVID and cardiovascular risks.

2. Affordable Childcare & Early Learning

  • Design policy for affordable, publicly funded childcare with real municipal flexibility.
  • Support pilot programs for workplace-supported childcare in partnership with local employers.

3. Economic Empowerment

  • Launch a Women Entrepreneurs Fund: grants and mentorship for women-owned businesses.
  • Create a provincial directory to promote women-owned vendors for public procurement.
  • Advocate for fair parental leave and re-entry supports in private sector hiring practices.

4. Leadership & Participation

  • Develop a “Women Candidate Bootcamp” covering fundraising, organizing, and digital campaigning.
  • Establish leadership fellowships with post-secondary and professional institutions.
  • Create a Women’s Advisory Council to influence the party’s platform and policy focus.

5. Equity in Policy & Budgeting

  • Push for mandatory Gender-Based Analysis (GBA+) in all provincial budget decisions.
  • Host an annual Ontario Women’s Budget Summit to assess equity outcomes and impact.
  • Publish annual equity performance reports across key ministries and social programs.

Ongoing Initiatives

Initiative Goal Frequency
Policy Roundtables Bring experts and community members together Quarterly
Mentorship Circles Connect aspiring women leaders to mentors Monthly
Public Forums & Town Halls Direct public engagement on women’s issues Bi-Annual
Research Partnerships Collaborate with think tanks and academics Ongoing
Media & Messaging Amplify women’s leadership stories and ideas Monthly

Measuring Progress

  • Policy Wins: Are our proposals being adopted, heard, or debated?
  • Participation Growth: How many new women are engaging, mentoring, and leading?
  • Community Reach: Are we showing up in the places where women need support?
  • Recognition & Visibility: Are our voices shaping platforms, media, and public thinking?

Next Steps

  • Convene a launch session to align around your top two priorities for the year.
  • Establish working groups based on interest, region, and lived experience.
  • Continue growing the group in a way that reflects your vision, not anyone else’s.

With deep respect and appreciation,

Mansoor Qureshi
Leader, Ontario Centrist Party

Get Involved

Whether you’re ready to lead, learn, or simply connect—there’s a place for you at Women at the Centre.

Women At The Centre
Join the Movement


Join Our WhatsApp Group


Talk to Our Team

A Letter to Durham: Community-Centered Leadership Begins Here

To: Asif Khan
From: Mansoor Qureshi, Leader of the Ontario Centrist Party
Re: Taking Root in Durham – What Local Leadership Requires NowAsif,Thank you for taking on the responsibility of leading our first Constituency Association in Durham. You have earned the trust to build something real, not just symbolic.

Durham is a bellwether region. If Ontario is a puzzle, Durham is the edge pieces. It borders Toronto, touches farmland, holds heavy industry, and houses tens of thousands of commuters. It has urban pain points and rural blind spots. And in politics, it is often treated like a corridor, not a community.

We are here to change that. And you, as Chair, are going to lead the charge not by noise, but by design.

Durham’s Actual Issues and the Role of a Centrist Response

1. Health System Failures in North Durham

Wait times in Lakeridge Health have become normalized. Rural patients in Uxbridge, Scugog, and Brock are underserved and often drive over 45 minutes for care.

Your move: Convene a Health Access Roundtable this summer. Include paramedics, family doctors, nurse practitioners, and patients. Start building our party’s call for regionally allocated walk-in clinics and integrated telehealth staffing, especially for the north.

2. Unsynchronized Transit Across the Region

The GO system is designed for Toronto-bound travel. DRT is fragmented. East-west routes between towns like Clarington to Ajax or Whitby to Pickering are painful.

Your move: Collect a small sample of commuter journey diaries from residents across each zone. Use that to frame a policy brief on intra-Durham transit funding so that young workers, parents, and seniors can move within the region, not just out of it.

3. Incoherent Housing Growth in Clarington, Pickering, and Courtice

Developments are being approved faster than schools and clinics can open. Municipalities are often cornered between provincial mandates and local resistance.

Your move: Publish a Durham Growth Tracker online. Show residents visually where housing is growing faster than infrastructure. Use it to justify CPO’s call for infrastructure-tied approvals. No new major projects without matched school and healthcare investment.

4. Youth Drift: Mental Health, Purpose, and Belonging

Durham’s youth, especially in Oshawa and North Durham, are falling through the cracks. Services are disconnected. Volunteerism is down. Drug use and anxiety are up.

Your move: Propose a pilot Durham Youth Civic Corps, a summer or weekend model that combines recreation, mentorship, and community service. Partner with libraries, mosques, churches, and school boards. We need to prove we can build belonging, not just talk about it.

5. Rural Durham Feels Forgotten

Brock Township, Scugog, and even parts of Uxbridge feel like policy afterthoughts. Internet access, business investment, and mental health support are weak.

Your move: Drive out there. Sit with farmers, firefighters, and co-op boards. Build our case for rural microgrants that support small repairs, mental health check-ins, and tech upgrades. We don’t need to promise millions. We need to show up.

How You Organize: Precision Over Visibility

You do not need everyone to know who you are right away. You need ten well-placed people in ten communities to know exactly what you are doing.

1. Divide the Region

Treat Durham as five regions:

  • North: Uxbridge, Scugog, Brock
  • East: Clarington, Courtice
  • Core: Oshawa, Whitby
  • West: Ajax, Pickering
  • Anchor Hubs: Major transit and health nodes

Assign a local contact or liaison per zone by September. No titles, just real relationships.

2. Monthly Intelligence Loop

Set a rhythm: one listening event, one community visit, and one written dispatch per month. Post it on our blog. Keep it short, real, and helpful.

3. Own One File

Choose one file that Durham residents feel every week. Health, transit, housing, schools — pick one. And become the adult in the room on it. Show up with plans, not punchlines.

Closing Thought

Your credibility will come from rhythm, not reaction.

Start slow, but do not stop. Make our party known not by what we say, but by how we behave.

We do not have legacy baggage. That means we do not have excuses either.

Lead with sincerity. Build in the open. Listen like your life depends on it.

You have my full backing, Asif. Let’s build Durham right.

Mansoor Qureshi
Leader, Ontario Centrist Party
https://ontariocentristparty.ca/

A Letter to Milton: Local Leadership Starts With Listening

Strategic Advisory Note: Milton CA Leadership Priorities

To: Syed Mohsin Rizvi, Chair – Milton CA
From: Mansoor Qureshi, Leader – Ontario Centrist Party
Date: June 2025
Re: Milton Needs Leadership That Solves, Not Just Speaks

Mohsin,

Milton’s growth story is undeniable—but the provincial response has been slow, fragmented, and often dismissive of what residents are going through on the ground.

We don’t need to match other parties in messaging. We need to outperform them in problem-solving. Here’s where you start: these are Milton’s five most urgent issues—at the provincial level—and what you can do right now to start solving them.

1. School Overcrowding and Delayed Provincial Funding

The issue: Milton’s schools are among the most overcrowded in the province. Some have capacity over 120%, with kids spending years in portables.
Why it’s provincial: School board funding formulas are set by Queen’s Park, and capital approvals are slow, especially in high-growth towns like Milton.
What to do:

  • Request a meeting with Halton District School Board and identify top 3 pressure points.
  • Advocate publicly for automatic funding triggers tied to population thresholds—not political lobbying.
  • Start a local campaign: “No More Portables by 2027.”

2. Transit Neglect and East-West Disconnection

The issue: GO Transit focuses on getting people to Toronto—but local connectivity inside Halton is broken. Derry Road, Britannia, and Steeles corridors are congested, unsafe, and underserved.
Why it’s provincial: Metrolinx controls GO expansions and is prioritizing regional hubs over suburban mobility.
What to do:

  • Push for local bus pilot programs between Milton, Oakville, and Burlington through provincial transit grants.
  • Make the case for off-peak and weekend GO train expansion—especially for low-income and shift workers.
  • Collaborate with nearby CA teams to present a united Halton Transit Reform proposal to Queen’s Park.

3. Delayed Health Infrastructure

The issue: Milton’s hospital expansion is badly behind pace. Family doctors are scarce, and the town lacks mental health resources for youth and seniors.
Why it’s provincial: Hospital expansions, clinic licenses, and primary care access are under the Ministry of Health.
What to do:

  • Publish a Milton Care Gaps Report—get data on family doctor shortages, wait times, and service deserts.
  • Advocate for a Satellite Mental Health Hub with walk-in counselling for youth, integrated with local schools and rec centres.
  • Propose local medical student placement incentives in Milton through OMA and provincial channels.

4. Mismanaged Housing Intensification

The issue: Towers are going up, but parking, schools, traffic control, and services are falling behind. Residents feel development is imposed, not integrated.
Why it’s provincial: The Ontario government’s housing targets pressure municipalities, but with no enforcement of infrastructure balance.
What to do:

  • Call for a Growth Readiness Scorecard before provincial approvals: no build gets greenlit unless roads, schools, and clinics are accounted for.
  • Position CPO as the voice for “Yes to Growth, Only If it Works.”
  • Publicly challenge MPPs pushing one-size-fits-all targets without infrastructure accountability.

5. Lack of Provincial Investment in Newcomer Integration

The issue: Milton has one of the highest newcomer settlement rates in Ontario, but provincial services (employment, legal aid, community health) are still centralized in Mississauga or Toronto.
Why it’s provincial: Newcomer programs, ESL, and settlement funding flow through provincial ministries.
What to do:

  • Form a Milton Newcomer Working Group to collect lived experiences.
  • Advocate for decentralized provincial service access points in Milton: employment support, legal aid, and mental health.
  • Push for ESL classroom ratios and funding to reflect post-2020 population data, not outdated projections.

Next Steps for the CA

  • Build your leadership team around these five issue tracks: one volunteer per domain.
  • Begin regular contact with school trustees, regional councillors, and parent associations.
  • Host a Quarterly Milton CA Forum with guest experts—urban planners, educators, doctors—who can ground these problems in data, not just headlines.
  • Share one public dispatch per month: what you’re hearing, what you’re working on, and how residents can help shape policy.

Final Thought

Don’t waste time trying to look like a candidate. Build yourself as a connector—between the community and the provincial system. That’s where real influence begins.

Milton doesn’t just need a voice. It needs a bridge. And you, Mohsin, are in the best position to build it—with full support from the party.

Let me know when you’re ready to turn these tracks into team briefs or public campaigns. I’ll back your strategy fully.

Mansoor Qureshi
Leader, Ontario Centrist Party
https://ontariocentristparty.ca

Ontario’s $15 Billion EV Delay: What Honda’s Pause Really Means for People

This week, Ontario hit a speed bump in its push toward becoming a leader in electric vehicle (EV) manufacturing. Honda Canada announced it’s postponing its $15 billion investment project in Alliston — a project that was supposed to create thousands of jobs and bring long-term economic momentum to the province.

The plan included building an EV battery plant and retooling their vehicle assembly facility. It was seen as a cornerstone of Ontario’s green economy. The federal and provincial governments had pledged over $5 billion in public funding to support it. Now, Honda says the project is on hold for up to two years.

The reasons? Slower global demand for electric vehicles and new U.S. tariffs that affect how foreign-made EVs will be treated in the American market.

This isn’t just about factories or headlines. It’s about trust — and about real people in real towns who were counting on this.

A Story That Could Be Real — Even If It’s Not

To show what this means on a human level, let’s imagine a young man named Jayden. He’s not real, but his story could be.

Jayden is 21, living in Barrie with his mom and younger brother. He just finished trade school and was excited about the Honda expansion. He saw a future in it — an apprenticeship, a steady income, maybe even the chance to move out and support his family.

Now, that plan is on hold. No job, no clear answers, and no way to know when the opportunity will come back — or if it ever will.

This is what happens when we put billions into projects without guarantees. And it raises an important question: What do we owe the communities who buy into these promises?

Where the Ontario Centrist Party Stands

At the Ontario Centrist Party (CPO), we support bold investments in Ontario’s economy — especially in clean technology and innovation. But we also believe that public money should come with public protection.

If a project gets billions in support, there should be clear accountability:

  • What happens if timelines change?

  • What guarantees exist for local workers and communities?

  • How do we make sure these investments actually deliver long-term value — not just press conferences?

This pause from Honda is a reminder that Ontario can’t afford to build its future on single deals. We need strong economic ecosystems: skilled trades, flexible education, support for startups, and smart infrastructure that prepares us for whatever comes next.

The Bottom Line

Ontario has the talent, the will, and the resources to lead — but leadership isn’t just about headlines. It’s about staying power.

We’ll keep pushing for a province that protects its people, plans wisely, and never leaves workers like Jayden behind.

What’s Really Going On in Ontario? More on Jobs, Housing & the Road Ahead

Ontario isn’t on the verge of change—we’re already in the middle of it.

The headlines say the economy is up, jobs are growing, and transit is being built. But that’s not what most people feel. Rent is still high. Groceries cost more. Commutes are longer. And stable jobs are harder to find. For a lot of Ontarians, the future feels more uncertain than ever.

That’s why I’m sharing this update. Not to sell a talking point, but to be honest about where we’re at and what we need to do.

Our economy is growing, yes—but not for everyone. Big cities and some industries are doing well. Small towns and local businesses? Not so much. Inflation may be slowing, but most people still feel squeezed. Economic growth only matters if people actually feel it in their daily lives.

We’re seeing more jobs—mostly in transport and service work. But more and more of these jobs are contract, gig, or part-time. That means fewer benefits, no long-term security, and harder paths to owning a home or saving for retirement. Work should offer stability, not just hours.

Housing is the biggest problem we face. It used to be normal to buy a home in your late twenties. Today, people are still renting well into their forties. In some places, houses cost 15 or 20 times what the average person earns in a year. That’s not affordable. That’s broken. We need to build faster, crack down on speculation, and give cities more power to fix this locally.

Transit? We’ve been hearing about new lines for years. Ontario Line. Crosstown. Highway 413. But commuters are still stuck in traffic or waiting for buses that don’t come. Projects need to be finished—not just announced. Transit should be reliable, affordable, and make daily life easier.

The budget looks a little better. The deficit’s shrinking. Rebates are coming. That helps. But it’s not a long-term plan. We can’t rely on short-term handouts. We need smart spending—on housing, healthcare, transit, and education. Investments that actually make a difference.

There was a time—not that long ago—when one income could buy a house, raise a family, and build a future. That wasn’t a dream. That was real. It’s not gone forever. But we do have to fight for it.

We’re not broken. But we’re tired. And that’s fair.

The Ontario Centrist Party isn’t here to yell, divide, or blame. We’re here to focus on what works. We believe in balance. In real ideas that solve real problems. In leadership that’s calm, thoughtful, and clear.

We believe in you. In the people who show up, work hard, and still care about where Ontario is going. We’re here to serve that energy—not waste it.

Let’s stop waiting for someone else to fix it. Let’s fix it together.

Let’s get to work.

Case Study | A Nation at a Crossroads: Why Alberta Should Stay in Canada

Publisher: Ontario Centrist Party
Author: Mansoor Qureshi, Leader of the Ontario Centrist Party
Published: April 2025

Executive Summary

This case study explores the intensifying discourse around Alberta’s future within Canada following the 2025 federal election. Rising political, economic, and cultural grievances have led to renewed calls for separation. These conversations, while not new, now carry heightened urgency. In response, the Ontario Centrist Party undertook a multi-panel consultation involving constitutional scholars, economists, Indigenous leaders, civic leaders from Alberta, and policy experts from Ontario to explore the implications of Alberta separating from Canada.

The findings of this study are unequivocal: while Alberta has legitimate concerns, leaving Canada would cause more harm than good—for Alberta and the entire country. Instead, Alberta should lead the call for reform within the federation. A unified Canada that functions fairly and transparently remains the best vehicle for prosperity, representation, and resilience.

Background and Context

Alberta’s tension with the federal government is not new. But the recent election results have reawakened longstanding grievances related to energy policy, economic transfers, and political representation.

Premier Danielle Smith has reflected this growing sentiment, raising the possibility of greater autonomy or even secession. Her concerns include what many Albertans perceive as a lack of federal understanding of Alberta’s resource-based economy, a disproportionate financial contribution to Confederation, and limited say in national policy frameworks.

This study approaches these concerns with respect and sincerity. The goal is not to dismiss Alberta’s frustrations but to examine whether separation is a productive response—and whether Canada remains worth staying in.

Methodology

To ensure a balanced and well-reasoned perspective, this study drew from a wide spectrum of published insights, historical records, regional data, and thematic analyses that reflect Canada’s diversity of opinion and experience. These perspectives were categorized to reflect representative national, Alberta-based, and Ontario-based views—drawing on publicly available information and established policy debates.

  • National-level perspectives were shaped by existing analyses in constitutional law, federal economics, Indigenous governance, and Canada’s global diplomatic role.
  • Alberta-specific viewpoints were informed by commentaries on energy policy, local governance, fiscal autonomy, and rural economic development.
  • Ontario-situated insights included interprovincial coordination, fiscal equalization, urban infrastructure strategy, and democratic institutional reform.

While this study does not reflect direct contributions from any specific individual or institution, its reasoning framework was constructed to simulate multidisciplinary deliberation and test competing claims about national unity, secession, and cooperative reform.

In addition to the structured research approach, this case study draws from a wide range of personal conversations, community forums, and lived experiences shared by Canadians across provinces. From small business owners in Red Deer to urban planners in Mississauga, the human impact of interprovincial tension is not theoretical—it’s tangible. These insights have helped shape the tone and urgency of the arguments presented here.

Section I: The Practical Case Against Separation

A. Immediate Economic Disruption

  • Trade Uncertainty: Alberta is heavily integrated with national and international trade systems. A move toward independence would jeopardize Alberta’s ability to access markets, particularly through federal trade treaties.
  • Capital Flight: Investors prioritize stable governance and legal frameworks. The mere act of pursuing secession could provoke an exodus of capital and freeze new investments.
  • Jurisdictional Complexity: Alberta would need to establish its own banking system, currency policy, border infrastructure, immigration system, and central bank—all while negotiating exit terms with Canada.

B. Long-Term Structural Risk

  • Loss of Fiscal Backstops: Alberta benefits from federal programs such as employment insurance, disaster relief, and stabilization funding—even if it contributes more than it receives in other areas like equalization.
  • Infrastructure Replacement Costs: Alberta would need to rebuild systems currently managed federally, including passport control, regulatory bodies, and international diplomacy.
  • Brain Drain and Labour Disruption: A prolonged period of uncertainty could drive professionals—especially in medicine, engineering, and education—to provinces with more predictable futures.

C. Indigenous Legal Complexity

  • Alberta is home to numerous First Nations with treaty agreements with the Crown, not the Province. Any attempt to leave Canada would legally require Indigenous consent, potentially triggering years of litigation and conflict.

Section II: The Constitutional and Political Risks

A. Risk of National Disintegration

  • Chain Reaction: Alberta’s departure could encourage similar movements in Quebec, British Columbia, and even parts of Ontario or the North. Once the norm of secession is legitimized, Canada as a stable federation becomes fragile.
  • Collapse of Shared Services: National services like health transfers, environmental agreements, and interprovincial infrastructure depend on a cooperative federal model. These systems are not designed to function in a balkanized country.

B. Reduced Global Influence

  • From Partner to Petitioner: Alberta currently helps shape national policy. As an independent state, it would negotiate from a position of dependency with the U.S., the rest of Canada, and global bodies like the WTO.
  • Diplomatic Isolation: Building international credibility takes decades. Alberta would lack embassies, established trade representation, and legal entry into international organizations.

C. The Reformable Nature of the Constitution

  • Canada’s constitutional framework is flexible. Meaningful reforms—equalization restructuring, energy cooperation, Senate redesign—are politically difficult but legally possible. Alberta’s legitimate grievances can be addressed without withdrawal.

Section III: The Social and Civic Case for Unity

A. Shared History and Mutual Aid

  • During the Fort McMurray fires, emergency crews came from across the country. During Ontario’s flooding and Quebec’s ice storms, Albertans answered the call.
  • COVID-19 demonstrated that national crises require national responses. Alberta received PPE, vaccines, and logistical support from federal stockpiles and joint procurement.

B. Interprovincial Family and Economic Ties

  • Millions of Canadians live and work across provincial borders. Families, businesses, and supply chains are deeply integrated.
  • Breaking Confederation would force legal, financial, and logistical untangling that could divide households and disrupt essential services like healthcare portability and pension access.

C. National Identity and Civic Responsibility

  • Democracy includes the right to dissent. But it also carries the responsibility to improve systems from within.
  • We owe it to future generations to demonstrate that a mature country solves problems through reform—not rupture.

Recommendations

The Ontario Centrist Party proposes four specific reforms:

  1. Equalization Redesign: Launch a national consultation, co-led by Alberta and Ontario, to restructure equalization formulas for transparency and fairness.
  2. Senate Reform Dialogue: Establish a task force with equal provincial representation to explore regional balance in federal institutions.
  3. Energy Transition Partnership: Build a federal-provincial council with Alberta as a lead voice on resource development, emissions reduction, and innovation.
  4. Annual First Ministers’ Summit with Public Reporting: Mandate binding reporting of goals and progress to foster transparency and national accountability.

Conclusion

We urge Premier Smith and the people of Alberta to stay—not for nostalgia, but because the case for remaining in Canada is stronger when informed by both the lived experience of citizens and empirical evidence. Together, we can build a Canada that doesn’t just survive disagreement—but thrives because of its ability to reform, reflect, and grow from it.

 

Mansoor Qureshi
Leader, Ontario Centrist Party

Appendix A: Sources Simulated for Deliberative Analysis

National-Level Topics Referenced:

  • Reference papers on the Constitution Act, 1867 and 1982
  • Economic impact analyses from the Bank of Canada and Parliamentary Budget Office
  • Publications from Assembly of First Nations on federal-Indigenous relations
  • Canadian Defence and Foreign Affairs Institute white papers on sovereignty

Alberta-Based Topics Referenced:

  • Public statements and energy policy briefings from the Alberta government
  • Commentary and policy proposals from the Canada West Foundation
  • Municipal resolutions from AUMA (Alberta Urban Municipalities Association)
  • Alberta-specific economic data from StatsCan and the Fraser Institute

Ontario-Based Topics Referenced:

  • Interprovincial trade research from Conference Board of Canada
  • Ontario fiscal updates and equalization commentary
  • Papers on federalism from Munk School of Global Affairs
  • Urban infrastructure strategies from Metrolinx and Infrastructure Ontario

These sources provided the contextual foundation to simulate reasoned deliberation from key regions and institutions relevant to the national unity conversation.

This work represents a collaborative effort by researchers, community advocates, and public policy observers committed to understanding Canada’s federal dynamics. Their diverse input has enriched the analysis, ensuring it reflects not only constitutional logic and economic modeling, but also the day-to-day realities experienced by Canadians across the country.