Milton’s Catholic School Board Balances the Books. What Comes Next?

From the Milton Constituency Association – Ontario Centrist Party
June 25, 2025

On June 24, the Halton Catholic District School Board (HCDSB) approved a balanced operating budget of $533.9 million for the 2025–2026 school year.

Board Chair Marvin Duarte and Director of Education John Klein praised the effort as fiscally responsible and aligned with their multi-year strategy. Despite being the lowest-funded school board per student in Ontario, HCDSB continues to meet compliance targets set by the Ministry of Education.

For Milton residents, the news is both reassuring and frustrating. The Board is doing everything it can with limited provincial support. But the reality is that funding formulas are not keeping pace with population growth, student need, or facility demand.

What the Numbers Show

  • Projected total enrolment: 36,421 students across elementary and secondary levels

  • Estimated revenue: $546.1 million

  • Estimated expenses: $533.9 million

  • Budget submission deadline: June 30, 2025

On paper, this is a balanced and compliant budget. On the ground, it reflects a system that is stretched thin, especially in fast-growing communities like Milton.

A Centrist Perspective on Education in Growth Regions

According to Syed Mohsin Rizvi, Chair of the Milton Constituency Association:

“Milton’s growth is visible in every classroom, every hallway, and every school parking lot. Our teachers are stepping up, but the provincial support isn’t keeping up. This is not about meeting minimums. It’s about building a future that works.”

The Ontario Centrist Party respects the careful stewardship shown by HCDSB leadership. But we also believe that the Ministry of Education must act to correct a structural imbalance in how education funding is delivered to high-growth communities.

What Needs to Change

1. Enrolment-Linked Capital Funding
The province should tie school capital project approvals directly to population growth data, so that new buildings are authorized as need increases, not delayed by bureaucracy.

2. Mid-Year Funding Adjustments
Current funding models rely too heavily on outdated projections. Milton needs a dynamic model that reflects actual student growth as it happens.

3. Frontline Support and Staffing Stability
Balanced budgets should not come at the expense of under-resourced classrooms or burnt-out educators. Investments in mental health, special education, and support staff must be built into the baseline.

Our Next Step

Milton continues to meet the challenges placed before it. But it cannot do this alone. The provincial government must treat growing communities like Milton as priorities, not footnotes.

The Ontario Centrist Party is preparing a public policy submission to the Ministry of Education that outlines common-sense reforms to ensure funding fairness across Ontario. Milton will be at the center of that conversation.

We encourage all residents — parents, students, teachers, and local leaders — to get involved.

Connect with the Milton CA
Website: https://ontariocentristparty.ca/milton
WhatsApp: CPO Milton CA Whatsapp

Women in the Centre: Launching a Bold Agenda for Ontario’s Future

Letter to the Founding Members of Women in the Centre

To all the incredible women who’ve joined Women in the Centre,

I want to start this letter with humility. As a man writing to a group of accomplished, capable, and community-driven women, I understand that my role here is not to lead, it’s to support. What follows is not a directive, but a set of suggestions. This agenda is meant to offer a starting point, a framework that I hope serves as a helpful foundation as you decide together what this group will become.

Over the last few years, I’ve listened closely to countless women across Ontario; mothers, professionals, caregivers, entrepreneurs that speak about the structural and personal barriers they continue to face. What I heard was honest, often difficult, and deeply motivating. This group exists because those voices matter and because Ontario needs to reflect them in our politics, in our priorities, and in our leadership.

Women in the Centre is a civic initiative within the Ontario Centrist Party, but it belongs entirely to its members. The agenda below is simply a guide, a tool to help us begin moving in a direction that brings meaningful change to women’s lives across this province.

Vision & Core Deliverables

  • Policy Development: Drive policy that reflects lived experience and supports real progress for women in Ontario.
  • Leadership Pipeline: Identify, mentor, and support women into leadership and political roles across the province.
  • Community Mobilization: Build networks that inform, connect, and empower women to lead change where they live and work.

Year One Priorities

1. Women’s Health & Reproductive Care

  • Establish a taskforce focused on OB/GYN access, postpartum care, and rural health gaps.
  • Advocate for improved mental health resources, including perimenopause and trauma-informed care.
  • Push for stronger data collection and research on women’s long-COVID and cardiovascular risks.

2. Affordable Childcare & Early Learning

  • Design policy for affordable, publicly funded childcare with real municipal flexibility.
  • Support pilot programs for workplace-supported childcare in partnership with local employers.

3. Economic Empowerment

  • Launch a Women Entrepreneurs Fund: grants and mentorship for women-owned businesses.
  • Create a provincial directory to promote women-owned vendors for public procurement.
  • Advocate for fair parental leave and re-entry supports in private sector hiring practices.

4. Leadership & Participation

  • Develop a “Women Candidate Bootcamp” covering fundraising, organizing, and digital campaigning.
  • Establish leadership fellowships with post-secondary and professional institutions.
  • Create a Women’s Advisory Council to influence the party’s platform and policy focus.

5. Equity in Policy & Budgeting

  • Push for mandatory Gender-Based Analysis (GBA+) in all provincial budget decisions.
  • Host an annual Ontario Women’s Budget Summit to assess equity outcomes and impact.
  • Publish annual equity performance reports across key ministries and social programs.

Ongoing Initiatives

Initiative Goal Frequency
Policy Roundtables Bring experts and community members together Quarterly
Mentorship Circles Connect aspiring women leaders to mentors Monthly
Public Forums & Town Halls Direct public engagement on women’s issues Bi-Annual
Research Partnerships Collaborate with think tanks and academics Ongoing
Media & Messaging Amplify women’s leadership stories and ideas Monthly

Measuring Progress

  • Policy Wins: Are our proposals being adopted, heard, or debated?
  • Participation Growth: How many new women are engaging, mentoring, and leading?
  • Community Reach: Are we showing up in the places where women need support?
  • Recognition & Visibility: Are our voices shaping platforms, media, and public thinking?

Next Steps

  • Convene a launch session to align around your top two priorities for the year.
  • Establish working groups based on interest, region, and lived experience.
  • Continue growing the group in a way that reflects your vision, not anyone else’s.

With deep respect and appreciation,

Mansoor Qureshi
Leader, Ontario Centrist Party

Get Involved

Whether you’re ready to lead, learn, or simply connect—there’s a place for you at Women at the Centre.

Women At The Centre
Join the Movement


Join Our WhatsApp Group


Talk to Our Team

A Letter to Durham: Community-Centered Leadership Begins Here

To: Asif Khan
From: Mansoor Qureshi, Leader of the Ontario Centrist Party
Re: Taking Root in Durham – What Local Leadership Requires NowAsif,Thank you for taking on the responsibility of leading our first Constituency Association in Durham. You have earned the trust to build something real, not just symbolic.

Durham is a bellwether region. If Ontario is a puzzle, Durham is the edge pieces. It borders Toronto, touches farmland, holds heavy industry, and houses tens of thousands of commuters. It has urban pain points and rural blind spots. And in politics, it is often treated like a corridor, not a community.

We are here to change that. And you, as Chair, are going to lead the charge not by noise, but by design.

Durham’s Actual Issues and the Role of a Centrist Response

1. Health System Failures in North Durham

Wait times in Lakeridge Health have become normalized. Rural patients in Uxbridge, Scugog, and Brock are underserved and often drive over 45 minutes for care.

Your move: Convene a Health Access Roundtable this summer. Include paramedics, family doctors, nurse practitioners, and patients. Start building our party’s call for regionally allocated walk-in clinics and integrated telehealth staffing, especially for the north.

2. Unsynchronized Transit Across the Region

The GO system is designed for Toronto-bound travel. DRT is fragmented. East-west routes between towns like Clarington to Ajax or Whitby to Pickering are painful.

Your move: Collect a small sample of commuter journey diaries from residents across each zone. Use that to frame a policy brief on intra-Durham transit funding so that young workers, parents, and seniors can move within the region, not just out of it.

3. Incoherent Housing Growth in Clarington, Pickering, and Courtice

Developments are being approved faster than schools and clinics can open. Municipalities are often cornered between provincial mandates and local resistance.

Your move: Publish a Durham Growth Tracker online. Show residents visually where housing is growing faster than infrastructure. Use it to justify CPO’s call for infrastructure-tied approvals. No new major projects without matched school and healthcare investment.

4. Youth Drift: Mental Health, Purpose, and Belonging

Durham’s youth, especially in Oshawa and North Durham, are falling through the cracks. Services are disconnected. Volunteerism is down. Drug use and anxiety are up.

Your move: Propose a pilot Durham Youth Civic Corps, a summer or weekend model that combines recreation, mentorship, and community service. Partner with libraries, mosques, churches, and school boards. We need to prove we can build belonging, not just talk about it.

5. Rural Durham Feels Forgotten

Brock Township, Scugog, and even parts of Uxbridge feel like policy afterthoughts. Internet access, business investment, and mental health support are weak.

Your move: Drive out there. Sit with farmers, firefighters, and co-op boards. Build our case for rural microgrants that support small repairs, mental health check-ins, and tech upgrades. We don’t need to promise millions. We need to show up.

How You Organize: Precision Over Visibility

You do not need everyone to know who you are right away. You need ten well-placed people in ten communities to know exactly what you are doing.

1. Divide the Region

Treat Durham as five regions:

  • North: Uxbridge, Scugog, Brock
  • East: Clarington, Courtice
  • Core: Oshawa, Whitby
  • West: Ajax, Pickering
  • Anchor Hubs: Major transit and health nodes

Assign a local contact or liaison per zone by September. No titles, just real relationships.

2. Monthly Intelligence Loop

Set a rhythm: one listening event, one community visit, and one written dispatch per month. Post it on our blog. Keep it short, real, and helpful.

3. Own One File

Choose one file that Durham residents feel every week. Health, transit, housing, schools — pick one. And become the adult in the room on it. Show up with plans, not punchlines.

Closing Thought

Your credibility will come from rhythm, not reaction.

Start slow, but do not stop. Make our party known not by what we say, but by how we behave.

We do not have legacy baggage. That means we do not have excuses either.

Lead with sincerity. Build in the open. Listen like your life depends on it.

You have my full backing, Asif. Let’s build Durham right.

Mansoor Qureshi
Leader, Ontario Centrist Party
https://ontariocentristparty.ca/

Case Study | A Nation at a Crossroads: Why Alberta Should Stay in Canada

Publisher: Ontario Centrist Party
Author: Mansoor Qureshi, Leader of the Ontario Centrist Party
Published: April 2025

Executive Summary

This case study explores the intensifying discourse around Alberta’s future within Canada following the 2025 federal election. Rising political, economic, and cultural grievances have led to renewed calls for separation. These conversations, while not new, now carry heightened urgency. In response, the Ontario Centrist Party undertook a multi-panel consultation involving constitutional scholars, economists, Indigenous leaders, civic leaders from Alberta, and policy experts from Ontario to explore the implications of Alberta separating from Canada.

The findings of this study are unequivocal: while Alberta has legitimate concerns, leaving Canada would cause more harm than good—for Alberta and the entire country. Instead, Alberta should lead the call for reform within the federation. A unified Canada that functions fairly and transparently remains the best vehicle for prosperity, representation, and resilience.

Background and Context

Alberta’s tension with the federal government is not new. But the recent election results have reawakened longstanding grievances related to energy policy, economic transfers, and political representation.

Premier Danielle Smith has reflected this growing sentiment, raising the possibility of greater autonomy or even secession. Her concerns include what many Albertans perceive as a lack of federal understanding of Alberta’s resource-based economy, a disproportionate financial contribution to Confederation, and limited say in national policy frameworks.

This study approaches these concerns with respect and sincerity. The goal is not to dismiss Alberta’s frustrations but to examine whether separation is a productive response—and whether Canada remains worth staying in.

Methodology

To ensure a balanced and well-reasoned perspective, this study drew from a wide spectrum of published insights, historical records, regional data, and thematic analyses that reflect Canada’s diversity of opinion and experience. These perspectives were categorized to reflect representative national, Alberta-based, and Ontario-based views—drawing on publicly available information and established policy debates.

  • National-level perspectives were shaped by existing analyses in constitutional law, federal economics, Indigenous governance, and Canada’s global diplomatic role.
  • Alberta-specific viewpoints were informed by commentaries on energy policy, local governance, fiscal autonomy, and rural economic development.
  • Ontario-situated insights included interprovincial coordination, fiscal equalization, urban infrastructure strategy, and democratic institutional reform.

While this study does not reflect direct contributions from any specific individual or institution, its reasoning framework was constructed to simulate multidisciplinary deliberation and test competing claims about national unity, secession, and cooperative reform.

In addition to the structured research approach, this case study draws from a wide range of personal conversations, community forums, and lived experiences shared by Canadians across provinces. From small business owners in Red Deer to urban planners in Mississauga, the human impact of interprovincial tension is not theoretical—it’s tangible. These insights have helped shape the tone and urgency of the arguments presented here.

Section I: The Practical Case Against Separation

A. Immediate Economic Disruption

  • Trade Uncertainty: Alberta is heavily integrated with national and international trade systems. A move toward independence would jeopardize Alberta’s ability to access markets, particularly through federal trade treaties.
  • Capital Flight: Investors prioritize stable governance and legal frameworks. The mere act of pursuing secession could provoke an exodus of capital and freeze new investments.
  • Jurisdictional Complexity: Alberta would need to establish its own banking system, currency policy, border infrastructure, immigration system, and central bank—all while negotiating exit terms with Canada.

B. Long-Term Structural Risk

  • Loss of Fiscal Backstops: Alberta benefits from federal programs such as employment insurance, disaster relief, and stabilization funding—even if it contributes more than it receives in other areas like equalization.
  • Infrastructure Replacement Costs: Alberta would need to rebuild systems currently managed federally, including passport control, regulatory bodies, and international diplomacy.
  • Brain Drain and Labour Disruption: A prolonged period of uncertainty could drive professionals—especially in medicine, engineering, and education—to provinces with more predictable futures.

C. Indigenous Legal Complexity

  • Alberta is home to numerous First Nations with treaty agreements with the Crown, not the Province. Any attempt to leave Canada would legally require Indigenous consent, potentially triggering years of litigation and conflict.

Section II: The Constitutional and Political Risks

A. Risk of National Disintegration

  • Chain Reaction: Alberta’s departure could encourage similar movements in Quebec, British Columbia, and even parts of Ontario or the North. Once the norm of secession is legitimized, Canada as a stable federation becomes fragile.
  • Collapse of Shared Services: National services like health transfers, environmental agreements, and interprovincial infrastructure depend on a cooperative federal model. These systems are not designed to function in a balkanized country.

B. Reduced Global Influence

  • From Partner to Petitioner: Alberta currently helps shape national policy. As an independent state, it would negotiate from a position of dependency with the U.S., the rest of Canada, and global bodies like the WTO.
  • Diplomatic Isolation: Building international credibility takes decades. Alberta would lack embassies, established trade representation, and legal entry into international organizations.

C. The Reformable Nature of the Constitution

  • Canada’s constitutional framework is flexible. Meaningful reforms—equalization restructuring, energy cooperation, Senate redesign—are politically difficult but legally possible. Alberta’s legitimate grievances can be addressed without withdrawal.

Section III: The Social and Civic Case for Unity

A. Shared History and Mutual Aid

  • During the Fort McMurray fires, emergency crews came from across the country. During Ontario’s flooding and Quebec’s ice storms, Albertans answered the call.
  • COVID-19 demonstrated that national crises require national responses. Alberta received PPE, vaccines, and logistical support from federal stockpiles and joint procurement.

B. Interprovincial Family and Economic Ties

  • Millions of Canadians live and work across provincial borders. Families, businesses, and supply chains are deeply integrated.
  • Breaking Confederation would force legal, financial, and logistical untangling that could divide households and disrupt essential services like healthcare portability and pension access.

C. National Identity and Civic Responsibility

  • Democracy includes the right to dissent. But it also carries the responsibility to improve systems from within.
  • We owe it to future generations to demonstrate that a mature country solves problems through reform—not rupture.

Recommendations

The Ontario Centrist Party proposes four specific reforms:

  1. Equalization Redesign: Launch a national consultation, co-led by Alberta and Ontario, to restructure equalization formulas for transparency and fairness.
  2. Senate Reform Dialogue: Establish a task force with equal provincial representation to explore regional balance in federal institutions.
  3. Energy Transition Partnership: Build a federal-provincial council with Alberta as a lead voice on resource development, emissions reduction, and innovation.
  4. Annual First Ministers’ Summit with Public Reporting: Mandate binding reporting of goals and progress to foster transparency and national accountability.

Conclusion

We urge Premier Smith and the people of Alberta to stay—not for nostalgia, but because the case for remaining in Canada is stronger when informed by both the lived experience of citizens and empirical evidence. Together, we can build a Canada that doesn’t just survive disagreement—but thrives because of its ability to reform, reflect, and grow from it.

 

Mansoor Qureshi
Leader, Ontario Centrist Party

Appendix A: Sources Simulated for Deliberative Analysis

National-Level Topics Referenced:

  • Reference papers on the Constitution Act, 1867 and 1982
  • Economic impact analyses from the Bank of Canada and Parliamentary Budget Office
  • Publications from Assembly of First Nations on federal-Indigenous relations
  • Canadian Defence and Foreign Affairs Institute white papers on sovereignty

Alberta-Based Topics Referenced:

  • Public statements and energy policy briefings from the Alberta government
  • Commentary and policy proposals from the Canada West Foundation
  • Municipal resolutions from AUMA (Alberta Urban Municipalities Association)
  • Alberta-specific economic data from StatsCan and the Fraser Institute

Ontario-Based Topics Referenced:

  • Interprovincial trade research from Conference Board of Canada
  • Ontario fiscal updates and equalization commentary
  • Papers on federalism from Munk School of Global Affairs
  • Urban infrastructure strategies from Metrolinx and Infrastructure Ontario

These sources provided the contextual foundation to simulate reasoned deliberation from key regions and institutions relevant to the national unity conversation.

This work represents a collaborative effort by researchers, community advocates, and public policy observers committed to understanding Canada’s federal dynamics. Their diverse input has enriched the analysis, ensuring it reflects not only constitutional logic and economic modeling, but also the day-to-day realities experienced by Canadians across the country.

 

Open Letter to Alberta and Premier Danielle Smith — From the Leader of the Ontario Centrist Party

Mansoor Qureshi
Leader, Ontario Centrist Party
ontariocentristparty.ca
April 30, 2025

To: The Honourable Danielle Smith
Premier of Alberta
Office of the Premier
Edmonton, Alberta

Subject: A Respectful Appeal for Unity and Partnership

Dear Premier Smith and the citizens of Alberta,

I write to you today not as a partisan, and not as a critic, but as a fellow Canadian—and as the Leader of the Ontario Centrist Party.

This recent federal election has stirred strong emotions across the country. In Alberta, it has reignited longstanding frustrations—about fairness, recognition, and whether the federation still reflects the values and contributions of your province. I don’t dismiss that. I respect it. And I want to speak directly to it.

Let me say this first, without qualification: Alberta matters. It matters to our economy, to our national identity, and to the future of this country.

But I also want to ask—respectfully and sincerely—is walking away really the answer?

Today, I offer a case not out of fear, but out of hope: hope that Alberta will continue to lead within Canada. This message is informed by voices from across the country: national experts, Alberta-based leaders, and everyday citizens in Ontario who want to build this country, not break it.

Separation will cost more than it solves. It brings immense uncertainty: from trade relationships and investor confidence to infrastructure jurisdiction and regulatory chaos. Alberta would face the task of building sovereign military, immigration, and foreign policy institutions from scratch. Disentangling from the central bank, pension system, and national programs would take years—possibly decades—and come at great cost to every Albertan.

Even more critically, Alberta’s long-term influence—its ability to shape national policy, advocate for industry, and protect its future—is far greater from within Confederation than from outside of it. Inside Canada, Alberta has allies. It has leverage. And it has the power to drive national conversations on energy, innovation, and taxation.

Outside of it, Alberta becomes a negotiating party—not a decision-maker. That’s not independence. That’s isolation.

Beyond the economic and political implications, there is something even more important to consider: the bond we share as Canadians. In times of crisis—fires, floods, pandemics—we do not ask which province needs help. We just show up. We send what we have. We carry each other.

No federation is perfect. Ours certainly isn’t. But it’s not beyond reform. It is, however, worth preserving.

As a father, a community leader, and a citizen, I often think about what we teach the next generation. Do we show them that frustration justifies fracture? Or do we model what it means to lead with patience, courage, and principle—even when it’s hard?

My commitment to you, and to Alberta, is this: the Ontario Centrist Party will fight for a federation that listens better, respects more, and works smarter. We support equalization reform. We support energy leadership that includes Alberta—not just consults it. And we support real transparency in federal-provincial dialogue, because trust requires it.

Premier Smith, Alberta is not a problem to be managed. It is a partner to be respected.

You are not alone. And you don’t have to go it alone.

Let’s not walk away from one another. Let’s lead the way forward—together.

With the highest regard and respect,

Mansoor Qureshi
Leader, Ontario Centrist Party

After the 2025 Election: Ontario’s Voice of Reason

Good evening, fellow Ontarians and Canadians,

In the wake of the federal election, I want to offer a few reflections—not just as the Leader of the Ontario Centrist Party, but as a citizen of this country who deeply values democracy and unity.

First, congratulations to Prime Minister Mark Carney and the Liberal Party on forming the next government. We may hold differing political views, but democratic outcomes deserve respect. We wish the new government wisdom, integrity, and an open heart in service to all Canadians.

But let’s also be honest—this election stirred up a lot more than results.

Ontario Doesn’t Run from Responsibility

We’ve seen tension. We’ve seen blame. But let’s set the record straight.

Ontario shows up.

  • We vote in high numbers.

  • We carry our weight in every federal decision.

  • We lead with calm, not chaos.

We didn’t rig anything. We did our democratic duty—and we did it with integrity.

When Canada needs common sense and steady leadership, Ontario steps up. We don’t do it for credit—we do it because it’s the right thing to do.

So yes, we expect respect—not because we’re sensitive, but because we’ve earned it.

What We Stand For

At the Ontario Centrist Party, we aren’t chasing headlines or clout. We stand for:

  • Strong ideas over strong personalities

  • Unity over division

  • Solutions that work, no matter where they come from

We support policies that bring Canadians together, expand opportunity, and strengthen families and communities.

What’s Working at the Federal Level

Let’s acknowledge some wins:

  • Childcare affordability has improved life for working families.

  • Transit and green infrastructure investments have created jobs and reduced emissions.

  • New healthcare agreements—while imperfect—have added much-needed support.

  • Immigration policies have filled labour gaps and enriched our society.

These deserve credit.

But Challenges Remain

  • Housing affordability is slipping further out of reach.

  • Immigration support systems need strengthening—connection matters.

  • National unity is fraying, and finger-pointing isn’t the answer.

  • Economic pressures demand steady, disciplined leadership.

Ontario’s Role Moving Forward

We’re not here to fan flames.

We’re here to do the work—just like the entrepreneurs, teachers, healthcare workers, and families across this province who move us forward every day.

Ontario isn’t loud. But when we speak, we speak with purpose.

We don’t claim to have all the answers. But we do expect a seat at the table—and an equal voice in shaping Canada’s path.

Let’s Raise the Standard

This wasn’t a turning point. It was a test. And now, it’s time to show who we are—not as partisans, but as Canadians.

Let’s drop the drama, raise the standard, and move forward—together.

Ontario is ready.

Thank you for watching,
Mansoor Qureshi
Leader, Ontario Centrist Party

Your Vote Is Powerful — But It Has to Be Thoughtful

This election, there’s a lot of emotion in the air—and for good reason. People are upset. The situation in Palestine and Israel is devastating, and it’s affecting how many voters are thinking about their choices.

Let me start by saying: I understand that. These are real issues that touch people deeply.

But as the Leader of the Ontario Centrist Party, I have to be clear—foreign policy is not something we control at the provincial level. Our job is to make decisions that impact your everyday life in Ontario:

  • Can you get the healthcare you need?

  • Is your child’s school doing right by them?

  • Can you afford to live in your own city?

  • Are jobs and small businesses being supported?

These are the things we work on. And these are the issues your provincial vote directly affects.

I also want to say something that might not be popular, but I think it’s important:
Voting based on one emotional issue—no matter how real—can lead to outcomes you didn’t intend. A lot of politicians are counting on that. They’ll say one thing to win your vote, and do something else once they have power.

This is why we need to take a step back and vote with a clear head.

Here’s what I ask of you:

  • Look at who’s actually aligned with your values across the board—not just on one issue.

  • Start with local impact. That’s where change begins.

  • Stay grounded. Emotions matter, but decisions made in anger or grief often get used against us.

  • Be thoughtful in how you express yourself. Protests and advocacy are important. But criminal behaviour or division won’t bring change—it only sets us back.

If we want things to get better—for everyone—we have to vote with intention, not just emotion.

Thanks for taking the time to reflect on this.
Let’s make it count.

– Mansoor Qureshi
Leader, Ontario Centrist Party