Ontario’s $15 Billion EV Delay: What Honda’s Pause Really Means for People

This week, Ontario hit a speed bump in its push toward becoming a leader in electric vehicle (EV) manufacturing. Honda Canada announced it’s postponing its $15 billion investment project in Alliston — a project that was supposed to create thousands of jobs and bring long-term economic momentum to the province.

The plan included building an EV battery plant and retooling their vehicle assembly facility. It was seen as a cornerstone of Ontario’s green economy. The federal and provincial governments had pledged over $5 billion in public funding to support it. Now, Honda says the project is on hold for up to two years.

The reasons? Slower global demand for electric vehicles and new U.S. tariffs that affect how foreign-made EVs will be treated in the American market.

This isn’t just about factories or headlines. It’s about trust — and about real people in real towns who were counting on this.

A Story That Could Be Real — Even If It’s Not

To show what this means on a human level, let’s imagine a young man named Jayden. He’s not real, but his story could be.

Jayden is 21, living in Barrie with his mom and younger brother. He just finished trade school and was excited about the Honda expansion. He saw a future in it — an apprenticeship, a steady income, maybe even the chance to move out and support his family.

Now, that plan is on hold. No job, no clear answers, and no way to know when the opportunity will come back — or if it ever will.

This is what happens when we put billions into projects without guarantees. And it raises an important question: What do we owe the communities who buy into these promises?

Where the Ontario Centrist Party Stands

At the Ontario Centrist Party (CPO), we support bold investments in Ontario’s economy — especially in clean technology and innovation. But we also believe that public money should come with public protection.

If a project gets billions in support, there should be clear accountability:

  • What happens if timelines change?

  • What guarantees exist for local workers and communities?

  • How do we make sure these investments actually deliver long-term value — not just press conferences?

This pause from Honda is a reminder that Ontario can’t afford to build its future on single deals. We need strong economic ecosystems: skilled trades, flexible education, support for startups, and smart infrastructure that prepares us for whatever comes next.

The Bottom Line

Ontario has the talent, the will, and the resources to lead — but leadership isn’t just about headlines. It’s about staying power.

We’ll keep pushing for a province that protects its people, plans wisely, and never leaves workers like Jayden behind.

What’s Really Going On in Ontario? More on Jobs, Housing & the Road Ahead

Ontario isn’t on the verge of change—we’re already in the middle of it.

The headlines say the economy is up, jobs are growing, and transit is being built. But that’s not what most people feel. Rent is still high. Groceries cost more. Commutes are longer. And stable jobs are harder to find. For a lot of Ontarians, the future feels more uncertain than ever.

That’s why I’m sharing this update. Not to sell a talking point, but to be honest about where we’re at and what we need to do.

Our economy is growing, yes—but not for everyone. Big cities and some industries are doing well. Small towns and local businesses? Not so much. Inflation may be slowing, but most people still feel squeezed. Economic growth only matters if people actually feel it in their daily lives.

We’re seeing more jobs—mostly in transport and service work. But more and more of these jobs are contract, gig, or part-time. That means fewer benefits, no long-term security, and harder paths to owning a home or saving for retirement. Work should offer stability, not just hours.

Housing is the biggest problem we face. It used to be normal to buy a home in your late twenties. Today, people are still renting well into their forties. In some places, houses cost 15 or 20 times what the average person earns in a year. That’s not affordable. That’s broken. We need to build faster, crack down on speculation, and give cities more power to fix this locally.

Transit? We’ve been hearing about new lines for years. Ontario Line. Crosstown. Highway 413. But commuters are still stuck in traffic or waiting for buses that don’t come. Projects need to be finished—not just announced. Transit should be reliable, affordable, and make daily life easier.

The budget looks a little better. The deficit’s shrinking. Rebates are coming. That helps. But it’s not a long-term plan. We can’t rely on short-term handouts. We need smart spending—on housing, healthcare, transit, and education. Investments that actually make a difference.

There was a time—not that long ago—when one income could buy a house, raise a family, and build a future. That wasn’t a dream. That was real. It’s not gone forever. But we do have to fight for it.

We’re not broken. But we’re tired. And that’s fair.

The Ontario Centrist Party isn’t here to yell, divide, or blame. We’re here to focus on what works. We believe in balance. In real ideas that solve real problems. In leadership that’s calm, thoughtful, and clear.

We believe in you. In the people who show up, work hard, and still care about where Ontario is going. We’re here to serve that energy—not waste it.

Let’s stop waiting for someone else to fix it. Let’s fix it together.

Let’s get to work.

Case Study | A Nation at a Crossroads: Why Alberta Should Stay in Canada

Publisher: Ontario Centrist Party
Author: Mansoor Qureshi, Leader of the Ontario Centrist Party
Published: April 2025

Executive Summary

This case study explores the intensifying discourse around Alberta’s future within Canada following the 2025 federal election. Rising political, economic, and cultural grievances have led to renewed calls for separation. These conversations, while not new, now carry heightened urgency. In response, the Ontario Centrist Party undertook a multi-panel consultation involving constitutional scholars, economists, Indigenous leaders, civic leaders from Alberta, and policy experts from Ontario to explore the implications of Alberta separating from Canada.

The findings of this study are unequivocal: while Alberta has legitimate concerns, leaving Canada would cause more harm than good—for Alberta and the entire country. Instead, Alberta should lead the call for reform within the federation. A unified Canada that functions fairly and transparently remains the best vehicle for prosperity, representation, and resilience.

Background and Context

Alberta’s tension with the federal government is not new. But the recent election results have reawakened longstanding grievances related to energy policy, economic transfers, and political representation.

Premier Danielle Smith has reflected this growing sentiment, raising the possibility of greater autonomy or even secession. Her concerns include what many Albertans perceive as a lack of federal understanding of Alberta’s resource-based economy, a disproportionate financial contribution to Confederation, and limited say in national policy frameworks.

This study approaches these concerns with respect and sincerity. The goal is not to dismiss Alberta’s frustrations but to examine whether separation is a productive response—and whether Canada remains worth staying in.

Methodology

To ensure a balanced and well-reasoned perspective, this study drew from a wide spectrum of published insights, historical records, regional data, and thematic analyses that reflect Canada’s diversity of opinion and experience. These perspectives were categorized to reflect representative national, Alberta-based, and Ontario-based views—drawing on publicly available information and established policy debates.

  • National-level perspectives were shaped by existing analyses in constitutional law, federal economics, Indigenous governance, and Canada’s global diplomatic role.
  • Alberta-specific viewpoints were informed by commentaries on energy policy, local governance, fiscal autonomy, and rural economic development.
  • Ontario-situated insights included interprovincial coordination, fiscal equalization, urban infrastructure strategy, and democratic institutional reform.

While this study does not reflect direct contributions from any specific individual or institution, its reasoning framework was constructed to simulate multidisciplinary deliberation and test competing claims about national unity, secession, and cooperative reform.

In addition to the structured research approach, this case study draws from a wide range of personal conversations, community forums, and lived experiences shared by Canadians across provinces. From small business owners in Red Deer to urban planners in Mississauga, the human impact of interprovincial tension is not theoretical—it’s tangible. These insights have helped shape the tone and urgency of the arguments presented here.

Section I: The Practical Case Against Separation

A. Immediate Economic Disruption

  • Trade Uncertainty: Alberta is heavily integrated with national and international trade systems. A move toward independence would jeopardize Alberta’s ability to access markets, particularly through federal trade treaties.
  • Capital Flight: Investors prioritize stable governance and legal frameworks. The mere act of pursuing secession could provoke an exodus of capital and freeze new investments.
  • Jurisdictional Complexity: Alberta would need to establish its own banking system, currency policy, border infrastructure, immigration system, and central bank—all while negotiating exit terms with Canada.

B. Long-Term Structural Risk

  • Loss of Fiscal Backstops: Alberta benefits from federal programs such as employment insurance, disaster relief, and stabilization funding—even if it contributes more than it receives in other areas like equalization.
  • Infrastructure Replacement Costs: Alberta would need to rebuild systems currently managed federally, including passport control, regulatory bodies, and international diplomacy.
  • Brain Drain and Labour Disruption: A prolonged period of uncertainty could drive professionals—especially in medicine, engineering, and education—to provinces with more predictable futures.

C. Indigenous Legal Complexity

  • Alberta is home to numerous First Nations with treaty agreements with the Crown, not the Province. Any attempt to leave Canada would legally require Indigenous consent, potentially triggering years of litigation and conflict.

Section II: The Constitutional and Political Risks

A. Risk of National Disintegration

  • Chain Reaction: Alberta’s departure could encourage similar movements in Quebec, British Columbia, and even parts of Ontario or the North. Once the norm of secession is legitimized, Canada as a stable federation becomes fragile.
  • Collapse of Shared Services: National services like health transfers, environmental agreements, and interprovincial infrastructure depend on a cooperative federal model. These systems are not designed to function in a balkanized country.

B. Reduced Global Influence

  • From Partner to Petitioner: Alberta currently helps shape national policy. As an independent state, it would negotiate from a position of dependency with the U.S., the rest of Canada, and global bodies like the WTO.
  • Diplomatic Isolation: Building international credibility takes decades. Alberta would lack embassies, established trade representation, and legal entry into international organizations.

C. The Reformable Nature of the Constitution

  • Canada’s constitutional framework is flexible. Meaningful reforms—equalization restructuring, energy cooperation, Senate redesign—are politically difficult but legally possible. Alberta’s legitimate grievances can be addressed without withdrawal.

Section III: The Social and Civic Case for Unity

A. Shared History and Mutual Aid

  • During the Fort McMurray fires, emergency crews came from across the country. During Ontario’s flooding and Quebec’s ice storms, Albertans answered the call.
  • COVID-19 demonstrated that national crises require national responses. Alberta received PPE, vaccines, and logistical support from federal stockpiles and joint procurement.

B. Interprovincial Family and Economic Ties

  • Millions of Canadians live and work across provincial borders. Families, businesses, and supply chains are deeply integrated.
  • Breaking Confederation would force legal, financial, and logistical untangling that could divide households and disrupt essential services like healthcare portability and pension access.

C. National Identity and Civic Responsibility

  • Democracy includes the right to dissent. But it also carries the responsibility to improve systems from within.
  • We owe it to future generations to demonstrate that a mature country solves problems through reform—not rupture.

Recommendations

The Ontario Centrist Party proposes four specific reforms:

  1. Equalization Redesign: Launch a national consultation, co-led by Alberta and Ontario, to restructure equalization formulas for transparency and fairness.
  2. Senate Reform Dialogue: Establish a task force with equal provincial representation to explore regional balance in federal institutions.
  3. Energy Transition Partnership: Build a federal-provincial council with Alberta as a lead voice on resource development, emissions reduction, and innovation.
  4. Annual First Ministers’ Summit with Public Reporting: Mandate binding reporting of goals and progress to foster transparency and national accountability.

Conclusion

We urge Premier Smith and the people of Alberta to stay—not for nostalgia, but because the case for remaining in Canada is stronger when informed by both the lived experience of citizens and empirical evidence. Together, we can build a Canada that doesn’t just survive disagreement—but thrives because of its ability to reform, reflect, and grow from it.

 

Mansoor Qureshi
Leader, Ontario Centrist Party

Appendix A: Sources Simulated for Deliberative Analysis

National-Level Topics Referenced:

  • Reference papers on the Constitution Act, 1867 and 1982
  • Economic impact analyses from the Bank of Canada and Parliamentary Budget Office
  • Publications from Assembly of First Nations on federal-Indigenous relations
  • Canadian Defence and Foreign Affairs Institute white papers on sovereignty

Alberta-Based Topics Referenced:

  • Public statements and energy policy briefings from the Alberta government
  • Commentary and policy proposals from the Canada West Foundation
  • Municipal resolutions from AUMA (Alberta Urban Municipalities Association)
  • Alberta-specific economic data from StatsCan and the Fraser Institute

Ontario-Based Topics Referenced:

  • Interprovincial trade research from Conference Board of Canada
  • Ontario fiscal updates and equalization commentary
  • Papers on federalism from Munk School of Global Affairs
  • Urban infrastructure strategies from Metrolinx and Infrastructure Ontario

These sources provided the contextual foundation to simulate reasoned deliberation from key regions and institutions relevant to the national unity conversation.

This work represents a collaborative effort by researchers, community advocates, and public policy observers committed to understanding Canada’s federal dynamics. Their diverse input has enriched the analysis, ensuring it reflects not only constitutional logic and economic modeling, but also the day-to-day realities experienced by Canadians across the country.

 

Open Letter to Alberta and Premier Danielle Smith — From the Leader of the Ontario Centrist Party

Mansoor Qureshi
Leader, Ontario Centrist Party
ontariocentristparty.ca
April 30, 2025

To: The Honourable Danielle Smith
Premier of Alberta
Office of the Premier
Edmonton, Alberta

Subject: A Respectful Appeal for Unity and Partnership

Dear Premier Smith and the citizens of Alberta,

I write to you today not as a partisan, and not as a critic, but as a fellow Canadian—and as the Leader of the Ontario Centrist Party.

This recent federal election has stirred strong emotions across the country. In Alberta, it has reignited longstanding frustrations—about fairness, recognition, and whether the federation still reflects the values and contributions of your province. I don’t dismiss that. I respect it. And I want to speak directly to it.

Let me say this first, without qualification: Alberta matters. It matters to our economy, to our national identity, and to the future of this country.

But I also want to ask—respectfully and sincerely—is walking away really the answer?

Today, I offer a case not out of fear, but out of hope: hope that Alberta will continue to lead within Canada. This message is informed by voices from across the country: national experts, Alberta-based leaders, and everyday citizens in Ontario who want to build this country, not break it.

Separation will cost more than it solves. It brings immense uncertainty: from trade relationships and investor confidence to infrastructure jurisdiction and regulatory chaos. Alberta would face the task of building sovereign military, immigration, and foreign policy institutions from scratch. Disentangling from the central bank, pension system, and national programs would take years—possibly decades—and come at great cost to every Albertan.

Even more critically, Alberta’s long-term influence—its ability to shape national policy, advocate for industry, and protect its future—is far greater from within Confederation than from outside of it. Inside Canada, Alberta has allies. It has leverage. And it has the power to drive national conversations on energy, innovation, and taxation.

Outside of it, Alberta becomes a negotiating party—not a decision-maker. That’s not independence. That’s isolation.

Beyond the economic and political implications, there is something even more important to consider: the bond we share as Canadians. In times of crisis—fires, floods, pandemics—we do not ask which province needs help. We just show up. We send what we have. We carry each other.

No federation is perfect. Ours certainly isn’t. But it’s not beyond reform. It is, however, worth preserving.

As a father, a community leader, and a citizen, I often think about what we teach the next generation. Do we show them that frustration justifies fracture? Or do we model what it means to lead with patience, courage, and principle—even when it’s hard?

My commitment to you, and to Alberta, is this: the Ontario Centrist Party will fight for a federation that listens better, respects more, and works smarter. We support equalization reform. We support energy leadership that includes Alberta—not just consults it. And we support real transparency in federal-provincial dialogue, because trust requires it.

Premier Smith, Alberta is not a problem to be managed. It is a partner to be respected.

You are not alone. And you don’t have to go it alone.

Let’s not walk away from one another. Let’s lead the way forward—together.

With the highest regard and respect,

Mansoor Qureshi
Leader, Ontario Centrist Party

After the 2025 Election: Ontario’s Voice of Reason

Good evening, fellow Ontarians and Canadians,

In the wake of the federal election, I want to offer a few reflections—not just as the Leader of the Ontario Centrist Party, but as a citizen of this country who deeply values democracy and unity.

First, congratulations to Prime Minister Mark Carney and the Liberal Party on forming the next government. We may hold differing political views, but democratic outcomes deserve respect. We wish the new government wisdom, integrity, and an open heart in service to all Canadians.

But let’s also be honest—this election stirred up a lot more than results.

Ontario Doesn’t Run from Responsibility

We’ve seen tension. We’ve seen blame. But let’s set the record straight.

Ontario shows up.

  • We vote in high numbers.

  • We carry our weight in every federal decision.

  • We lead with calm, not chaos.

We didn’t rig anything. We did our democratic duty—and we did it with integrity.

When Canada needs common sense and steady leadership, Ontario steps up. We don’t do it for credit—we do it because it’s the right thing to do.

So yes, we expect respect—not because we’re sensitive, but because we’ve earned it.

What We Stand For

At the Ontario Centrist Party, we aren’t chasing headlines or clout. We stand for:

  • Strong ideas over strong personalities

  • Unity over division

  • Solutions that work, no matter where they come from

We support policies that bring Canadians together, expand opportunity, and strengthen families and communities.

What’s Working at the Federal Level

Let’s acknowledge some wins:

  • Childcare affordability has improved life for working families.

  • Transit and green infrastructure investments have created jobs and reduced emissions.

  • New healthcare agreements—while imperfect—have added much-needed support.

  • Immigration policies have filled labour gaps and enriched our society.

These deserve credit.

But Challenges Remain

  • Housing affordability is slipping further out of reach.

  • Immigration support systems need strengthening—connection matters.

  • National unity is fraying, and finger-pointing isn’t the answer.

  • Economic pressures demand steady, disciplined leadership.

Ontario’s Role Moving Forward

We’re not here to fan flames.

We’re here to do the work—just like the entrepreneurs, teachers, healthcare workers, and families across this province who move us forward every day.

Ontario isn’t loud. But when we speak, we speak with purpose.

We don’t claim to have all the answers. But we do expect a seat at the table—and an equal voice in shaping Canada’s path.

Let’s Raise the Standard

This wasn’t a turning point. It was a test. And now, it’s time to show who we are—not as partisans, but as Canadians.

Let’s drop the drama, raise the standard, and move forward—together.

Ontario is ready.

Thank you for watching,
Mansoor Qureshi
Leader, Ontario Centrist Party

Why Ontario’s Housing Market Feels Rigged

If you’re living in Ontario and trying to buy a home, rent a place, or even just plan for the future, you don’t need a politician to tell you what you already know: housing feels completely rigged.

In today’s update, we want to break down why so many Ontarians feel shut out of the dream of home ownership—and why that feeling isn’t just in your head.

What’s Happening in Ontario’s Housing Market

Over the past decade, Ontario’s housing market has shifted from being a place where regular people could build a life to a playground for speculators, insiders, and big investors. Let’s talk about how we got here:

1. Speculation, Not Shelter

Government policies—at both the federal and provincial levels—have quietly favoured people treating housing like a stock market, not a basic need. Incentives, tax structures, and loopholes allow large investors to buy dozens or hundreds of homes, squeezing out families who just want one.

2. Too Much Red Tape, Too Little Building

We have rules and processes that delay building homes where people actually want to live. Approval processes are slow, expensive, and often prioritize paperwork over real planning. The result? Demand keeps growing, but supply falls behind.

3. Interest Rates Punish First-Time Buyers

The federal government’s interest rate hikes were supposed to “cool down” the market. Instead, they mainly crushed regular people’s ability to qualify for a mortgage—while cash buyers and corporate investors barely blinked. The ones trying to buy their first home? Locked out.

4. Misaligned Priorities

Government initiatives often look great in headlines—promises of affordability, action plans, task forces. But when you peel them back, too many policies benefit municipalities, developers, and financial institutions more than they help the people actually living here.

Why It Feels Rigged

When you connect these dots, it’s easy to see why it doesn’t feel like an accident.

The system rewards those who already have capital, connections, and influence. It leaves everyday Ontarians trying to compete on an unfair playing field, where basic shelter is treated like a luxury good.

This is why working families, young professionals, seniors downsizing, and newcomers to Canada all feel the same tight squeeze, no matter where they live—from Toronto to Thunder Bay.

Housing isn’t just a financial transaction. It’s about stability, security, and the ability to build a future.

Where the Ontario Centrist Party (CPO) Stands

At the Ontario Centrist Party, we believe housing should be accessible, attainable, and fair.

  • We believe homes should be for living in first, not just investing in.

  • We believe rules and approvals need to be fast, clear, and aimed at increasing real, livable supply.

  • We believe government policies should help regular Ontarians compete—not stack the deck against them.

  • We believe that balancing fairness with growth is the key to long-term prosperity.

This is the start of the conversation.

In the coming days, we’ll be sharing detailed proposals on how the Ontario Centrist Party plans to fix the housing market — from reforming development approvals, to unlocking real supply, to rebalancing tax structures to serve people before profits.

Because Ontario deserves better.

And we’re ready to get to work.

✅ Stay tuned for our next platform update, where we’ll lay out real, practical solutions to Ontario’s housing crisis — not just more headlines.

Ontario’s Honest Look at the 2025 Federal Election

We’re just days away from a federal election that could reshape the direction of the country. But for many Ontarians, the mood isn’t hopeful or inspired—it’s uncertain. And for good reason.

In this update, I speak plainly about the growing discomfort many of us feel when we look at our choices.

  • The Liberals have introduced legislation like Bill C-11, C-63, and C-26 that—while framed as public interest—raise serious concerns about privacy, free speech, and government overreach.

  • The Conservatives are leaning into stronger punitive measures and emergency powers. While security matters, there’s a thin line between safety and suppressing rights.

  • The NDP, despite good intentions, have spent years backing Liberal moves that many now view as compromising democratic accountability.

As Ontarians, we’re watching this unfold and asking: Where’s the voice of balance?

That’s where the Centrist Party comes in. Not to fan flames or play sides—but to insist on policies that are thoughtful, transparent, and rooted in real-world outcomes, not ideology.

This video lays it out plainly. I hope you’ll take a few minutes to watch and reflect—not just on who to vote for, but why.

Ontario deserves more than slogans. We deserve a say.
Let’s make it count. Let’s get to work.

Ontario Weekend Update – April 19, 2025: What This Election Means for Us

It’s been another big week in Ontario. With the federal election less than two weeks away, a lot of Ontarians are asking the right question: What does this actually mean for us?

That’s what I want to walk through in this week’s update.

Ontario & The Federal Election

Ontario holds 122 seats in Parliament. That means our voices—our votes—will shape what kind of country we’re going to be moving into 2026 and beyond.

We’re hearing a lot of national narratives. But not enough people are talking about what’s on the line right here at home:

  • U.S. tariffs are already impacting Ontario’s economy, especially in manufacturing and auto.

  • The provincial government has committed $11B in relief—which helps—but it’s a short-term fix.

  • GM is pausing EV van production in Ontario, affecting 1,200 workers. That’s not just a headline. That’s people’s jobs and families.

  • At the same time, we’re seeing some movement on critical mineral approvals in the Ring of Fire, which could be huge—if managed responsibly.

This is what’s happening on the ground. These are the kinds of issues that federal leadership either helps move forward—or stalls out.

What the Federal Parties Are Offering

I’m not here to tell you who to vote for. I’m here to ask the questions I think we all need to be asking:

  • Will the Liberals under Carney offer a fresh direction, or just a more polished version of the last decade?

  • Will the Conservatives under Poilievre support Ontario’s growth, or shift too much burden back to the provinces without the resources to back it?

  • Will the NDP offer sustainable plans for healthcare and housing—or just ideas that sound good but can’t hold up under real pressure?

What Ontario Needs

Ontario doesn’t need a babysitter. We don’t need more slogans. We need federal partners who:

  • Respect our autonomy

  • Support economic development without micromanaging

  • Understand that Ontario’s growth benefits the whole country

We’re not just a large province. We’re the country’s economic engine. And in a world where democracies are looking for stability and leadership, Ontario has a real opportunity to lead—not just react.

So as we head into this final stretch before election day, take the time to think not just about what’s being promised—but how it affects us here in Ontario.

This is our moment to ask for better. And to lead by example.

Let’s stay focused. Let’s keep asking real questions. And as always—

Let’s get to work.

— Mansoor Qureshi
Leader, Centrist Party of Ontario

Federal Election 2025: What It Means for Ontario

A centrist look at national choices through a provincial lens

As the 2025 federal election picks up momentum, we’re seeing a lot of national narratives take shape. Leaders are speaking to Canada, but here in Ontario, we have to ask: what do these promises and policies really mean for us?

This isn’t about who you support—it’s about whether Ontario’s voice, economy, and long-term growth are being reflected in the direction of this country.

Here’s my latest message breaking it down:

A few realities to keep in mind as Ontarians:

  • The Liberal record is long. And while Mark Carney is more polished than Trudeau, his direction appears similar—especially on federal oversight, energy infrastructure, and interprovincial negotiations. His effectiveness may actually accelerate the same agenda we’ve seen over the last decade.

  • Pierre Poilievre is presenting a change in tone and approach—focusing on affordability and freedom. But his party hasn’t yet offered clear answers on how that shift will translate to support for infrastructure, housing, or public services in Ontario. We need clarity, not just contrast.

  • Jagmeet Singh and the NDP are emphasizing social supports and housing affordability. That matters. But for Ontario to grow, we need those priorities matched with serious economic planning and respect for provincial autonomy—especially around healthcare and education delivery.

My perspective as a centrist and an Ontarian:

This election is about more than Ottawa. It’s about how decisions made federally will shape what we can build here, locally. We need policies that reflect the scale of Ontario’s contribution—industrially, economically, and demographically.

Ontario can and should lead—on clean energy, technology, housing innovation, and democratic stability. But we need a federal partner that listens, not lectures. One that respects the unique challenges our province faces and works with us to build long-term, sustainable growth.

What you can do:

  • Ask better questions about how federal policies affect Ontario—not just slogans, but delivery (details matter)

  • Think about national unity not as an abstract issue, but one that impacts Ontario’s trade, energy, and workforce

  • Stay informed, stay engaged, and help keep the conversation rooted in practical outcomes—not partisanship

Ontario isn’t waiting for permission to lead. But we do need partners who see the province not just as a vote-rich region—but as a builder of Canada’s future.

Let’s keep moving forward—together.
Let’s get to work.